Aphilosophy, Convention, Faith and God.
28 Jul 2013
Reading Time: 15 minutesThey have sat down for dinner. The philosophers are at the first table, the conventional methodogists at another. The philosophers
Reading Time: 15 minutesThey have sat down for dinner. The philosophers are at the first table, the conventional methodogists at another. The philosophers
Reading Time: 12 minutesThe dialectic, as I have said earlier, cannot be taken too seriously. For when it is, the break that has
Reading Time: 6 minutesIf I am saying so myself: this title is pretty fkg great; hilarious. Anyways…. My reply to a comment by
Reading Time: 7 minutesI hope you have a good appetite. We are at a table in a restaurant. Laruelle is my dinner partner
Reading Time: 9 minutesI am a bit hard-headed. I think most critical thinkers/philosophers are. I find this the best basic method for my
Reading Time: 7 minutesTANGENT 5.16 I figure it prudent and sensible at this time to take a tangent, aside from the direct Laruelle-nonphilosophical
Reading Time: 10 minutesIts about time I get to the point. I have spent plenty of time talking around the issue. I have
Reading Time: 6 minutesWhat gives? This is the question. In partial thanks to Mr. Adkins, his site translation of some of Laruelle’s writings,
Reading Time: 7 minutesI have to admit, I had never encountered the understanding that I have come upon, nor this position from where
Reading Time: 3 minutes* * * [This is an updated copy of my reply to Taylor Adkins comment on my previous post, Direction
Copyright © 2025 Lance Kair, LPC | Website by TechG
You must be logged in to post a comment.