You are mattering

Exploring the being of knowing

The Beginning of Philosophy

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Schelling, F. W. J. von | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
— Read on iep.utm.edu/schellin/

—- The turn of the 19th century Philosopher Friedrich Schelling was a contemporary critic of Emmanuel Kant, who was ostensibly the father of the philosophical mess we call modernity but particularly of the 20th century form of it.

It is possible we are emerging from that mess presently.

mental health philosophy

I say that mental health is the signal and symbol of this emergence for our time.

But Back to Schelling

Schelling was noted for making the comment that Kant’s proposals would lead to nihilism. And that’s exactly what we got for the past 200+ years.

Philosophy, being inseparable from the world itself, integral (less a proactive means to capitalistic identity profits) and active in the iteration of all things known to be real, presents mental issue the realization and pronunciation of the lived conceptual experience of nihilism, the various manifestations of the subject caught ungrounded in the real substance of the universe.

It is through the lens is filtered the discrepancy between the positive formative substance and the positive material nothingness, that is, as the basis from which subjective meaning is able to be understandable as such, as an existent Being, that the various psychological disorders to their various intervention qualities, approaches, and attitudes are informed.

Through this lens psychology is helped as it hobbles along its presumptuous path. For, in its current manifestation, it does not distinguish between what is physically disruptive, which is to say, what is an actual disorder, analogous as a broken knee prevents one from walking, From mental health issues, which is to say the basis through which, say, I understand myself in order to be a productive member of the operating universe, and working towards the life that I want. Where there might be a physical disfunction of the brain which prevents a kind of real ability for actualization of agency, there might psychology have footing. But beyond that, we merely find pronunciations of a nihilism that is unable to reconcile itself with the true facets of existence. And we find this iterated through the 20th century philosophies, in their different subjective ways, especially.

Philosophy begins upon the subject realizing its own limitation in knowing as a lived experience of knowing: this is effective agency. This rather than perpetually being caught up in its own subjectivity merely affirming its ability in the world, to make it of its own meaning. Philosophy begins, as Aristotle might have said, when we begin to notice and make semantic distinctions at proper junctions of actual universal truth. But these junctions cannot be noticed when the world is filled with only modern psychological subjects; the junctures are routinely sutured over to be intentionally missed.

So it is that the beginning of philosophy comes through the modern forms of mental health of or over psychology, rather than the strict philosophical tradition of the Judeo-Greek tradition of the “scientific” Western mind’s psychology defining of mental health – Not for another prescription, not another oppressing ideological subjective political form. Exactly through seeking mental health and authentic engagement with the truth of reality philosophy as a grounded intellectual, somatic, and cognitive exercise begins.

Enjoying this? The Sunday Same is my biweekly letter: one essay like this, every other Sunday morning, straight to your inbox. Subscribe at lanceamh.substack.com.

A note on how I use AI. I write everything on this blog myself: the ideas, the arguments, the words. I do use AI, but as an editor, not a co-author. It helps me with grammar, formatting, and structure. That use is recent: AI has been part of my process only for roughly the past year’s worth of posts. Everything older was written without it, because there was nothing like it to use. What I have found is that AI most often misinterprets what I write philosophically, so its suggestions are usually wrong, and a good deal of my attention and editing goes into sculpting each post until it reflects the ideas correctly. The ideas are never AI’s.

For transparency, I keep a Word document of my original writing and the full exchanges, back and forth with the AI, that produced each post. If anyone is interested in how a piece came together, that record is available.

Share this article:

Leave a Reply

About this blog

Essays in mental health philosophy—less “tips,” more why things work (or don’t). I look at the first principles under therapy, psychiatry, psychology, and everyday life, and occasionally share notes from papers and books-in-progress.

This space stands alongside—not inside—my counseling practice. If you’re seeking therapy in Colorado, there’s a link in the footer.

About the author

Lance Kair, LPC, blends philosophy, mindfulness, and counseling to help clients find agency, meaning, fulfillment, and healing through deep understanding, self-awareness, and compassionate therapeutic collaboration.

Get new posts by email

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Subscribe to get new posts by email

Join 770 other subscribers

Copyright © 2026 Lance Kair, LPC